What was your initial opinion when reading Frankenstein?

What is the Best What was your initial opinion when reading Frankenstein??

Review of the What was your initial opinion when reading Frankenstein?:

What was your initial opinion when reading Frankenstein?

– I just finished the book today; this is probably my third classic book. I am not a very proficient reader and know very little of the theories behind Frankenstein. I’m quite ecstatic at recognising the contemporary thought that both Victor and the monster are the same being when reading more into it online.

This initial guess was consummated when the monster spoke and used a similar choice of vocabulary as Victor. But I wandered towards the conjecture the day after the monster was conceived. In that the monster had vanished and that Victor had no recollection of the monster’s whereabouts.

As well as the contradictory ‘fact’ that Victor is the only man to have seen this monster (besides the sightings made by wanderers that come from Victor, an unreliable narrator).

Contradictory because, in the very last pages, it is revealed that Robert too sights the monster and goes as far as to converse with him.

But I do believe I have my own explanation for the theory.

Victor is tenacious in the discovery of science, and early on in the book, he enlightens the reader of his love for natural philosophy. This was later counteracted and frowned upon when arriving at higher education by his lecturers.

Still, Victor pursues his passion with the alignment of modern science, specifically chemistry. He collects human remains in graveyards for his abominable concoction and drained himself for many months and many sleepless nights.

Victor gives it his all to fulfil his contract—the contract to reanimate the dead.But all his hard work and ill-torn labour come amiss; all his trials and tribulations, all his toils and troubles have been for nothing.

The monster, I believe, is the embodiment of grief.

The grief of time lost during his great lament and the sacrifice in his disposition.

He ventured forward into the discovery of science and wished to prevail in his chosen area of expertise, only to succumb to failure. His hopes and dreams are blown to smithereens. This monster, I believe, is an abstraction of this turmoil. Whether it’s mental illness, the lies of a broken man, or the coping mechanisms of a depraved killer The monster is this metaphor.

The evidence is within the contradiction of its own theory—that too, Robert sees the monster himself. The reason for this is because he too is experiencing his own grief in his employment.

Robert is a tenacious character, but one of exploration and navigation. He is just as avid about his pursuits as Victor. Sacrificing much wealth, time, and company for his aspirations, he tirelessly builds himself a crew after much time and hardship, setting forth on a journey to the North Pole to explore unventured lands beyound.

His efforts are later squandered by a stalemate. The ship he procured is landlocked by surrounding ice and is left marooned. Mutiny is succeeded by this, and all his efforts are exhausted. He, too, has failed.

Before Victor died, he bestowed the completion of his vengeance upon Robert. Riddling Robert with the same inescapable manifestation of grief as Victor passing the torch, so to speak.

The question about this theory now is: How did Victor die? Was it suicide? Or a man at the end of his spiritual wick? Or does Robert too hold the torch of torture and become the monster of his predecessor?

It’s been a brilliant, thought-provoking book, and I’ve grown all the wiser for reading it. I’d love to know anyone else’s theories in the comments. 

#initial #opinion #reading #Frankenstein,

Last update on 2024-04-23 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top